{"id":227075,"date":"2026-04-08T15:08:50","date_gmt":"2026-04-08T12:08:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/?p=227075"},"modified":"2026-04-08T15:08:50","modified_gmt":"2026-04-08T12:08:50","slug":"book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/press.azbuki.bg\/en\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/","title":{"rendered":"Book of nature in Croatian Glagolitic sermones de sanctis"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Prof. Dr. Andrea Rado\u0161evi\u0107, <\/strong><em>Old Church Slavonic Insitute \u2013 Zagreb (Croatia)<\/em><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.53656\/bel-2026-1s-6\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.53656\/bel-2026-1s-6<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Abstract<\/strong>. One of the most important sources for researching the Book of Nature in the Croatian Glagolitic medieval literature are sermon collections. The chapters based on the Book of Nature are found in the <em>de sanctis<\/em> cycle of the four Glagolitic manuscripts from the 16th century (<em>Disipul A<\/em>, <em>Disipul B<\/em>, <em>Disipul C<\/em>, <em>Disipul D<\/em>)<em>.<\/em> All the chapters were translated from the Latin sermon collection known as <em>Hortulus reginae<\/em>, which was written in the 15th century by\u00a0 German priest Magister Petrus Meffordis from Leipzig. His interpretation of the saint\u2019s biography is partly based on the development of analogies between selected parts of the respective hagiography and details from the Book of Nature inserted from various sources. The aim of the paper is to analyse his specific approach to linking the hagiographical and the natural, and also to examine the sources of the knowledge of nature transmitted in Glagolitic literature through the translation of texts from <em>Hortulus reginae<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>Keywords<\/em>: Croatian Glagolitic sermons, Meffreth, Book of Nature, hagiography<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>1.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/strong><strong>Introduction<\/strong>Sermons represent a valuable source for understanding the transmission of natural knowledge in Glagolitic community. The traces of medieval knowledge about nature are also found in treatises (such as the translation of <em>Fiore di Virt\u00f9<\/em> known as a <em>Cvijet kreposti<\/em>),<sup>1 <\/sup><em>Lucidarius<\/em> and animalistic exempla.<sup>2<\/sup> In Croatian Glagolitic literature not even short version of medieval bestiaries or <em>Physiologus<\/em> is preserved. To be more presicesly, most of the Glagolitic animalistic exempla come from sermons and moral didactic texts (Kapetanovi\u0107, 2004, p. 50; Zaradija Ki\u0161, 2008, pp. 125 \u2013 127).<\/p>\n<p>The focus of this paper is put on the Croatian Glagolitic sermons translated from the Latin collection <em>Sermones \u2018Meffreth\u2019 de tempore et de sanctis sive Hortulus Reginae <\/em>which was compiled by the 15<sup>th<\/sup>-century German author Magister Petrus Meffordis (Meffreth) from Leipzig (Cruel, 1966).<sup>3<\/sup> They are kept in the four Glagolitic mansucripts from the 16<sup>th<\/sup> century called <em>Disipul <\/em>(<em>Disipul A<\/em>, 16<sup>th<\/sup> century; <em>Disipul B<\/em>, 1558; <em>Disipul C<\/em>, 1541; <em>Disipul D<\/em>, 1600) which mostly contain Croatian translation of the Latin sermon collection <em>Sermones Discipuli<\/em> written by other German author, Dominican Johannes Herolt (\u0160tefani\u0107, 1960, pp. 240\u2013246; \u0160tefani\u0107, 1969, pp. 225 \u2013 237; Rado\u0161evi\u0107, 2015). All four manuscripts are written on Croatian with some traits of Croatian redaction of Old Church Slavonic. First three manuscripts (<em>Disipul A<\/em>, <em>Disipul B<\/em>, <em>Disipul C<\/em>) were written by priest Mihovil from Belgrad, while the latest one (<em>Disipul D<\/em>) was written by Ivan Brozovi\u0107 from Selce. The reception of Meffreth&#8217;s sermons in Croatian literature has only recently been established (Rado\u0161evi\u0107, 2022). It is known that parts of <em>Hortulus reginae<\/em> were also attested in other Slavic literatures (Korzo, 2024; \u041f\u0440\u0435\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f, 2018; \u0411\u0435\u043b\u043e\u0431\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430, 1985).<\/p>\n<p>Meffreth&#8217;s sermons combine (pseudo)etymological explanations, Christian iconography, and unexpected parallels between the hagiographical and natural worlds. According to <em>ars praedicandi<\/em> turning to the <em>Book<\/em> <em>of<\/em> <em>Nature<\/em> was one of the principle for teaching moral lessons, by making analogies with natural phenomena, explaining the properties of things etc. (see Wenzel, 2013, pp. 77 \u2013 82). Properties of natural realm appear as a point of departure for the explication of major virtues of the saints, their character traits or the key parts of their <em>vita<\/em>. Every saint is compared to at least one natural spieces. Most of the time, passages on natural spieces come right after the Biblical pericope. These passages are usually compiled from different antic, early Christian and medieval sources on natural knowledge (Aristotle&#8217;s <em>Historia Animalium<\/em>, Pliny the Elder&#8217;s<em> Naturalis Historia<\/em>,<em> Physiologus<\/em>, Ambrose&#8217;s <em>Hexameron<\/em>, Isidore&#8217;s of Seville<em> Etymologiae<\/em>, Bartholomew&#8217;s of England<em> De proprietatibus rerum<\/em>, Vincent&#8217;s of Beauvais<em> Speculum naturale<\/em>, Thomas of Cantimpr\u00e9<em> Liber de natura rerum<\/em>, Albert the Great<em> De animalibus<\/em>), bestiaries, aviaries, lapidaries, although not all of them are always explicitely mentioned.Meffreth&#8217;s main principle was to surprise the recipient with his atypical associative approach to the different sources of natural knowledge. Although his sermones mainly follow the principle of <em>imitatio Christi<\/em> by presenting the virtues of the saints, the emphasis is put on the recognizability of the saints in the sense of highlighting their character traits. Here the natural world appears in a threefold role: as <em>memorandi<\/em>,<em> imitandi <\/em>and<em> admirandi <\/em>(Rado\u0161evi\u0107, 2022). It is usually interpreted as a symbol of morality and metaphysical truths, in such a way that its physical characteristics, behaviors and the role it plays in everyday human life are mostly, but not always, moralized. In Meffreth&#8217;s sermons the Book of Nature is not just mere medieval <em>sensus<\/em> moralis, but also a mirror, an incentive to find role models in so-called lower nature (Rado\u0161evi\u0107, 2022, p. 114; Weisl, 2018). In his sermons, one natural species has a variety of symbolic meanings, while several species may emerge as emblems of the same term.\u00a0<strong>2. Croatian Glagolitic <em>sermones de sanctis<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In the four glagolitic manuscripts passages from the Book of Nature appear most frequently in the introductions of sermons, but we also find them in the other parts of the texts, depending on whether the particular text is a complete translation of sermon from <em>Hortulus reginae<\/em> or, which is much more common, it is a translation of Herolt&#8217;s sermon with an introduction inserted from Meffreth. The allegorical interpretation of the natural world and its connection with the hagiographic themes is anounced by following the expressions: <em>duhovno razumi se<\/em>,<em> znamenue<\/em> <em>se<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Glagolitic sermons <em>de sanctis<\/em> represent a combination of the two most common ways of composing a hagiographical text: one in which the focus is on the narration of events from the lives of the saints, and the other primarly focused on their virtues. The connection between the natural and hagiographical motives, is often found in the interpretative etymology of the names of saints (St Peter, St Gregory the Great) as well as etymology of the names of a particular animals whose meaning is linked to a recognisable character trait of the saint (arabic etymology of word <em>phoenix<\/em> has parallels with the character trait of St Thomas the Apostole). Etymologies are mostly derived from Jacobus de Voragine&#8217;s <em>Legenda aurea <\/em>or Isidore&#8217;s of Seville <em>Etymologies <\/em>(Baarda, 1992). These (pseudo-)etymologies in particular had a mnemonic function (Rydel, 2016, p. 291), associating saints with certain qualities and virtues that we also find in certain natural species: courage and boldness are common traits of the lion and St Stephen, while vigilance and fidelity are virtues that adorn St Gregory the Great with the two animal creatures: the dog and the crane (Rado\u0161evi\u0107, 2022, p. 114). Unfortunately, due to some omissions of the etymological interpretation in all four Glagolitic manuscripts, the entry of a particular interpretation is sometimes unclear, such as the analogy to the singularity between St Thomas the Apostole and the phoenix (<em>D(u)hovn(i)m z(a)konom po fenik\u0161i razumi se b(la)\u017e(e)ni Toma ap(usto)l ere k(a)ko fenik\u0161a nima tovari\u0161a<\/em>, Disipul B, 119a<em> \/<\/em> <em>Mystice per Phoenicem intelligitur B. Thomas Apostolus: recte enim sicut Phoenix est avis signularis, carens pari<\/em>, <em>et apud Arabes nascitur, vocatur Phoenix, id est, singularis, uti dicit Isidorus<\/em>), as well as analogy between St Gregory the Great and the dog (<em>T(a)ko po z(a)k(o)nu te be\u0161tie b(la)\u017e(e)ni Grg(u)r bil\u2019 e vele bde\u0109 ere bdel\u2019 e sebi i B(og)u i \u010dredi<\/em>, Disipul B, 135d<em> \/ <\/em><em>Sic more illius animalis, B. Gregorius fuit valde vigilans. Ideo Gregorius in nostra lingua vigilans sonat, quia vigilavit sibi, Deo et gregi<\/em>).<\/p>\n<p>An excellent illustration of Meffreth&#8217;s intricate dependence on nature in interpreting the most notable virtues of saints is found in the <em>Sermon on Saint Gregory the Great<\/em> (<em>N(a) d(a)n s(ve)toga Grg(u)ra pape ispo(vednika)<\/em>, <em>Disipul B<\/em>, f. 134 \u2013 136v; <em>Disipul C<\/em>, f. 22r \u2013 26r; <em>Disipul D<\/em>, 119r \u2013 121v). This <em>sermon de sanctis<\/em> is developed on analogies with natural phenomena that occupy different positions on the <em>scala natura<\/em>, starting with a phenomenon that comes from the lowest inanimate world of stones (<em>geraticen<\/em>), then with the motif from the slightly higher vegetabile realm (<em>arbor inversa<\/em>), and finally with two animal species with higer rang (a <em>dog<\/em> as a representative of mammals and finally a crane from the world of birds). The fact that the bird (<em>crane<\/em>) appears last is likely consistent with the medieval notion that birds were superior to other animal creatures, frequently not regarded as animals in a strict sense. Althouth the stones occupies the lowest rung they are \u201enonetheless part of the reciprocal linkages that bound all things together in this ontological chain (\u2026) as well as they are a \u201epart of a teleological cosmos connected with the divine in its essence\u201c (Robertson, 2012, p. 99).<\/p>\n<p>In this sermon four natural spieces are used as a symbols of two virtues of Gregory the Great: humility and vigilance. Gregory&#8217;s humility as the peak of all the virtues is interpreted through the comparsion with stone <em>geraticen<\/em> and <em>arbor inversa<\/em>. The analogy with nature begins with the passage on stone <em>geraticen<\/em>, here atrributed to sixteenth book of Bartholomeus Anglicus <em>De proprietatibus rerum<\/em> <strong>(<\/strong>LiberXVI. <em>De lapidibus et metallis\/De Geratice<\/em>. Capitul LII).<\/p>\n<p><em>Me\u0161tar v kn(i)g(a)h od Naturi gov(o)ri od&#8217; nikoga kamena \u010dast&#8217;na ki se zove Eratikon koga mo\u0109 tako se is&#8217;ku\u0161a ako t(\u00ea)lo \u010d(lov\u00ea)ka medom poma\u017ee se, i stavi se muham, ako e ondi ta kamen&#8217; muhe bi\u017ee od nega i ne na\u0161kode t(\u00ea)lu. I tako e tu mo\u0109 ima ki ga pri sebi nosi da \u010dini \u010d(lov\u00ea)ka draga i prieta<\/em>, <em>Disipul B<\/em>, 134r \/\/<em>Magister libro proprietatum 16. ait de quodam lapide pretioso Geraticon nuncupato huius virtus sic probatur. Si corpus hominis melle inungitur, et muscis exponitur, si lapis ille est praesens corpus illud intactum remanet. Muscae mox fugient, et corpus eius non corrumpent. De lapide hoc dicitue in lapidario, quod gestatus, hominem reddit dilectum, et amabilem atquam gratum<\/em>, Hortulus reginae).<\/p>\n<p>The power of the stone <em>geraticen<\/em> was tested by smearing a person with honey and exposing them to flies. It was believed that a person who possessed the stone would avoid the flies&#8217; attack on their body, or that possession of the stone would make them more pleasing.<sup>4<\/sup> Allegorical interpretation of the stone is further expanded by Augustine&#8217;s sentences on humilty. The qualities of <em>geraticen<\/em> which occupies the lowest position od the <em>scala naturae<\/em> is quite well compared with Gregory&#8217;s the Great recognizable attribute which he retained even throughout his most illustrious period. Being anointed with the honey of praise and high esteem, he was untouched by the flies of pride since he possessed true humility:<\/p>\n<p><em>Duhovno po tom kamenu zn(a)m(e)niva poniznost ka e vele \u010dastna. Po Avgu(stin)u poniznost e(st) vele \u010dastna i gl(a)va vs(e)h dobrot&#8217;. I tada se pravo iskusi ako ka hv(a)la i \u010dast \u010d(lov\u00ea)ku ka\u017ee se tr \u010d(lov\u00ea)k zani\u0109ue ka\u017ee poniznost. To se zna od s(ve)toga Grg(u)ra ki bi\u0161e pomazan medom&#8217; hvale te\u0161koe trpel i bi\u017eal i ostal est netaknen&#8217; od muh&#8217;. Ere pi\u0161e se: ne hv(a)li \u010d(lov\u00ea)ka v \u017eivote. Takoe se zna da e imel pravu poniznost ere ako bi e ne imel muhe slatke hv(a)le (ta\u0161\u0107e slave) nega bi u\u0135idale. Zato e bil priet B(og)u i l\u00fbblen ci\u0109a poniznosti. Avgu(stin) ni\u0161t(a)r ne \u010dini nas priet&#8217;nih B(og)u k(a)ko poniznost ka vl\u010de k sebi b(o)\u017e\u00fb milost<\/em>, Disipul B, 134r.<\/p>\n<p>Other allegory of humility is <em>arbor inversa<\/em>,<sup>5<\/sup> a classical trope very popular among Renaissance theologians from the vegetabile world, a deeply rooted tree that cannot be uprooted by the winds of pride. It is introduced by Isidore of Seville&#8217;s sentence and further ellaborated on Aristotle&#8217;s analogy between the <em>arbor inversa<\/em> and a man, and finally by Bernard of Clairvaux statement on the importance of being humble.<\/p>\n<p><em>Od prvoga znati e da drivo s korenem tvrdo se dr\u017ei zemle. Na to Iz(i)dor gov(o)ri da drivo ko nima dobra koren&#8217;\u00ea lah&#8217;ko se spade od vet&#8217;ra, a ako ima gluboko koren&#8217;e v&#8217; zem&#8217;li ne more se izdriti. Duhovno po Ar(i)\u0161(totelu) gov(o)r(i) se drivo podvra\u0109eno ko ima koren&#8217;e zgora, a kite zdola \u010d(lov\u00ea)k e(st). Zato ako ne\u0109e\u0161 biti zvr\u017een vetrom&#8217; oholosti tribi e da gluboko koren&#8217; bude poniznos&#8217;ti\u00fb \u2026 K(a)ko drivo ko nima gluboko koren&#8217;\u00ea ere retko se naide da visoko zras&#8217;te. T(a)ko niedan na visinu n(e)b(e)sku ne more priti ako nima koren&#8217;\u00ea poniznosti. Brn(a)rd govori po poniznosti priha\u00ea se na visinu ere to e(st) put, a ne ini i ki prez&#8217; nega gre br\u017ee pade ner v&#8217;zide<\/em>, Disipul B, 134rv.<\/p>\n<p>These two species from the lower natural realm serve as an introduction to the enumeration of the four instances in the live of Gregory the Great in which the aforementioned virtue of humility (<em>poniznost<\/em>) was most prominently demonstrated:<\/p>\n<p><em>Zato s(ve)ti Grg(u)r vele gluboko e imel koren&#8217;e v poniznosti. Ka se zna v \u017eivlen&#8217;i i v nauku \u2026 V&#8217; besedi imel&#8217; e poniznost ere se e imenoval&#8217; sluga slug da sebe ne hv(a)le\u0109 da Is(u)hrsta g(ospo)d(i)na n(a)\u0161(e)go sluga \u2026 \u010c(e)trto ka\u017ee se nega poniznost v nauku ere v kn(i)g(a)h negovih ima se s(ve)t(a)l nauk i dokli e \u017eivel ci\u0109a velike poniznosti ni se otel dati na znan&#8217;e i suprot drugim ni \u0161timal vridnosti svoih<\/em>, Disipul B, 134v.<\/p>\n<p>The second half of the sermon draws on the animal and bird realm (dog and crane), symbols of vigilance and fidelity, whose choice is likely tied to one of the etymologies of Gregory&#8217;s name, in the meaning of &#8216;vigilant, attentive&#8217; from the Legenda Aurea (<em>vel Gregorius in lingua nostra vigilans sonat<\/em>). These passages rely mainly on Bartholomew of England<em> De proprietatibus rerum<\/em>, and indirectly on the encyclopaedia of Vincent of Beauvais. The connection between the natural and hagiographical is implemented through the analogy of vigilance and fidelity. The use of these two animal motifs aims to allegorise the relationship of this church father to God on the one hand and to humanity on the other, based on the shared virtues. The analogy involving the dog is promptly succeeded by the comparison of St Gregory to the crane, that was a symbol of of loyalty and vigilance to safeguard the community from peril. The association of St Gregory&#8217;s virtues with the attributes of the crane is likely influenced by Ambrose&#8217;s <em>Hexameron<\/em> in which crane is described as an exemplar of a modest leader. The crane&#8217;s distinctive posture of standing on one leg while grasping a stone with the other, which produces sound to alert other cranes in times of peril, serves as an analogy for Gregory the Great&#8217;s connection to his papal role. Specifically, his act of holding and dropping stones symbolically illustrated the awakening of the faithful and served as a warning against the peril posed by pagans, while his posture of standing on one leg denoted a renunciation of earthly glory (Rado\u0161evi\u0107, 2022, p. 120).<em>Zato prilikue se b(la)\u017e(e)ni Grg(u)r k\u2019 \u010duvaru od\u2019 \u017eer\u2019\u00eavi \u00b7 Ar(i)\u0161(totil) v\u2019 kn(i)g(a)h \u00b7dz\u0342 \u00b7 (= 8) animalium\u2019 gov(o)ri od\u2019 \u017eivot\u2019nih\u2019 da kada bdi na stra\u017ei stoi na ed\u2019noi nogi a v\u2019 drugoi dr\u017ei kami\u010dac\u2019 ako zaspe tako mu spade kami\u010dac na nogu i zbudi se i kri\u010di i ostali se probude i od pogibeli se o\u010duva\u00fb \u00b7 T(a)ko b(la)\u017e(e)ni Grg(u)r pomnivo e o \u010d\u2019redi g(ospo)dni bdel\u2019 ere e stal samo na ednoi nogi kada e za s(ve)tu crikav skrbno providil \u00b7 a drugu e gori dr\u017eal\u2019 kada ni maril\u2019 za sla vu sega s(ve)ta ere niedno \u017eelenie ni imel za imeti hv(a)lu od \u010d(lov\u00ea)k<\/em>, <em>Disipul C<\/em>, 25r.<\/p>\n<p>The conventional zoomorphic symbols of saints are infrequent in these sermons. The sole exception is the appearance of the eagle as a symbol of St John the Evangelist; nonetheless, an eagle appears alongside two other animals (ape, dog). In the sermon on St John the Evangelist (<em>Na sv. Ivana apostola i evan\u0111elista<\/em>) the concept of love as the fundamental principle of his sacred life is elucidated through a comparison of three animal instances of parental love. The spiritual love symbolized by the eagle, which is tested by youth&#8217;s prolonged gazing directly at the sun and which determines whether a youth can become a true member of the species, the motif found already in <em>Physiologus<\/em>, contrasts with the subjective feelings that dogs and apes have toward their offspring, which feelings represent an earthly love. The eagle&#8217;s glance at the sun and its ascent to the heavens allegorically symbolize John&#8217;s yearning for God and his pursuit of the heights of divine grace (Rado\u0161evi\u0107, 2022, p. 118).<\/p>\n<p><em>Duhov\u2019nim na\u010dinom H(rst) ve\u0109e e l\u00fbbil Iv(a)na (evan)\u0135(e)l(i)sta ki v priliki orla pi\u0161e se i s\u2019lnce b(o)\u017e(an)stva \u010dis\u2019to e gledal i glubinu tainosti n(e)b(es)kih bole e videl nere ini u\u010d(e)n(i)ki \u00b7 Zato nega H(rst) od mnogih\u2019 skr\u2019bi mimo inih ap(usto)l s\u2019hranil e<\/em>, <em>Disipul B<\/em>, 123r.<\/p>\n<p>The analogy between the natural and the hagiographical is not based on just one or two isolated characteristics of natural spieces, but on the comparison of many characteristics that come from different sources, from their basic properties to their use in daily life. The six properties of dove, mostly dervied from the Bartolomew of England are explained allegorically and linked to the main details from the hagiography of St Peter, such as the dove&#8217;s unique weeping-like song (Peter&#8217;s cries), the quantity of tears he shed after repeatedly denying Jesus, as Meffreth believed that the cries of St Peter could only be compared to the sorrow in the song of a dove, the attraction of others to the dovecote (the encouragement of sinful souls to return to the holy church), and even his intense love for the Lord, which in the natural world corresponds to the dove&#8217;s love for its parents. In addition to ornithological data, moral or allegorical interpretations, the passage about the dove also contains details about its medical and social uses from the agronomic (<em>Liber Ruralium Commodorum<\/em> written by Pietro de Crescenzi) and medical texts, <em>Viaticum<\/em> by Constatinus Africanus (Rado\u0161evi\u0107, 2022, p. 124).<em>Duhovno b(la)\u017e(e)ni P(e)t(a)r zove se Bariona, to se tlma\u010di s(i)n goluba i pravo zn(a)m(e)nue se golub ere e me\u00fb inimi ap(usto)li dobro \u017eivlen&#8217;e imel i vsi su ga l\u00fbbili ere ih e u\u010dil dobro \u017eiveti I tribi e zamiriti da golub ima .e.(=6) naturi ke se mogu b(la)\u017e(e)nomu P(e)tru pripodobiti (\u2026) Drugo golub\u2019 e velike l\u00fbb\u2019ve ere l\u00fbbi ot\u2019ca i pre\u017e nega ne\u0109e letiti. T(a)ko b(la)\u017e(e)ni P(e)t(a)r vele e l\u00fbbil g(ospo)d(i)na i za nega e vse ost(a)vil<\/em> (\u2026) <em>Treto golub ima petie za pla\u010d\u2019 navlastito kada m\u2019lade iz\u2019 g\u2019nezda zgubi ali tovari\u0161a \u00b7 T(a)ko b(la)\u017e(e)ni P(e)t(a)r \u010da e zata\u00eal\u2019 H(rst)a za pokoru plakal\u2019 se e<\/em>, Disipul B, 144v \u2013 145v.<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, a natural phenomenon that primarily served as an allegory of a specific saint&#8217;s virtues could acquire alternative interpretations by being associated not merely with the subject of the sermon (a particular aspect of saints <em>vita)<\/em>, but predominantly with its audience. During the enumeration of the six properties of dove, Meffreth introduces the motif of <em>crazy doves<\/em> that refuse to enter the dovecote, symbolizing the sacred church (<em>kako maneni golubi nete priti v golubinac nere sida\u00fb na drivo i gleda\u00fb na ku stran ote poletiti<\/em>). It is within this section of the text that the preacher briefly diverges from the prevailing modus <em>imitandi\/admirandi<\/em>, issuing explicit warnings to the audience.<\/p>\n<p>The context in which certain motifs from nature appear is sometimes surprising and somewhat unexpected. The connection between the phoenix (a bird without a mate) and St Thomas that is based on the motif of Thomas&#8217; isolation from the other apostles, which is caused by doubt as his most recognisable character trait, is indeed rather remarkable. Here the emphasis is not on narrating the events from Thomas&#8217;s mission to India, but rather on the portrayal of his doubt. This is a teaching that was substantially expanded upon by St Gregory the Great&#8217;s <em>Homilies<\/em>, on which Meffreth relies strongly. While the phoenix appeared in numerous mediaeval works as a symbol of Jesus Christ and the act of resurrection in general, due to the belief in his rebirth (Broek, 1972), the interpretation of its uniqueness and loneless from older bestiary descriptions appeared much more frequently from the Renaissance onwards (in Torquato Tasso <em>Gerusalemme liberata<\/em>). In glagolitic sermons phoenix functions as a dual symbol. Initially, it represents the apostle&#8217;s status, which was influenced by a character trait, doubt. Subsequently, it represents the spiritual rebirth of St. Tomas after he has purged himself of all undesirable personality traits.<\/p>\n<p><em>V Ekz(a)m(eron) v kn(i)g(a)h .v\u0342. <\/em>(= 3) <em>v k(a)p(itu)l .v\u0342. <\/em>(= 3) <em>gov(o)ri da fenik\u0161 e(st) ptica ka more \u017eiveti .t\u0342.<\/em>(= 300) <em>.h.m\u0342. <\/em>(= 660) <em>l(e)t i ve\u0109e i kada e h\u2019 kon\u2019cu \u017eivota t(a)ko u\u010dini nsebi gnizdo od tamena i mura i inih driv ka lipo di\u0161e. I kada se va\u017ege od puhan\u2019e vetrov\u2019 tada gre na gnizdo i umre, i paki o\u017eive . D(u)hovn(i)m z(a)konom po fenik\u0161i razumi se b(la)\u017e(e)ni Toma ap(usto)l ere k(a)ko fenik\u0161a nima tovari\u0161a t(a)ko b(la)\u017e(e)ni Toma meu vsimi ap(usto)li bil e v sum\u2019ni<\/em>, <em>Disipul B<\/em>, 119r<\/p>\n<p>In addition to etymological and pseudoetymological interpretations of the names of saints\u00a0 and animals, there are also attempts to find a species in the natural world whose characteristics reflect several details from the lives of saints. The primary aim of such analogies, as the example of the comparison of the St James holy apostle with a swallow, was to contribute to a more complete recollection of important events from his life. The relationship of the swallow to its nest and its young can be interpreted as a kind of mental map that guides us through the work of St James, who opened the way to the Christian faith with his preaching, converted sinners, and drove away the wrath of men.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The Croatian translation of passages from the 15<sup>th <\/sup>century Latin sermon collection <em>Hortulus reginae<\/em> that is kept in four Glagolitic manuscripts (<em>Disipul A<\/em>, <em>Disipul B<\/em>, <em>Disipul C<\/em>, <em>Disipul D<\/em>) represent a valuable source of information on the reception of the knowledge about natural world in the Glagolitic community. In these medieval sermones <em>de sanctis<\/em> motives from the natural realm are used as an symbols and allegories of divers parts of hagiographical narratives. The natural world functions as both a foundation for moral and allegorical interpretation and a basis for recounting significant events in a specific saint&#8217;s life (virtues, postulates, character traits, main episodes). Consequently, these sermons enrich both Glagolitic corpus of texts about natural knowledge and corpus of saints&#8217; <em>vitae<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>NOTES<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This work was created within the project <em>Croatian Glagolitic animalistic lexicon<\/em> \u2013 HAL, funded by the European Union \u2013 NextGenerationEU.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>On Croatian Glagolitic <em>Cvijet kreposti<\/em>, see Gabri\u0107-Bagari\u0107, 2012; Zaradija Ki\u0161, 2018; \u0160imi\u0107, Zaradija Ki\u0161, 2020.<\/li>\n<li>The term Glagolitic animalistic exempla was introduced by A. Zaradija Ki\u0161, 2006. When it comes to sermon collections, she analysed animalistic exempla in the <em>Korizmenjak<\/em> (1508), Croatian translation of the Italian Lenten collection <em>Quaresimale volgare<\/em> written by Franciscan Roberto Caracciolo da Lecce, and also the latest printed book in the Senj Glagolitic printing house. See Zaradija Ki\u0161, 2008; Zaradija Ki\u0161, 2010.<\/li>\n<li>According to Korzo (2024, p. 288), biographical notes on Petrus Meffordis are very limited. We only know that he was a priest in Meissen during the time of the bishop John the Fourth (Johannes Hoffmann von Schweidnitz, 1375 \u2013 1451). There are now questions about whether the Meffreth was the compiler of <em>Hortulus reginae<\/em> at all, or the name Meffreth refers to the sermon collection&#8217;s other name. Also some researchers reject the pressumption that the compiler was a Dominican (Cruel, 1879, pp. 486\u2013 93; Schmidtke, p. 2010). More about Meffreth, see in Kaczor, 2022.<\/li>\n<li>Similar explanation of<em> geraticen<\/em> is found in Albert the Great <em>Book of Minerals<\/em> (2. 2. 7): <em>The genuineness of the stone (gerachidem) may be tested in this way: while wearing the stone [a man] smears his whole body with honey and exposes [himself] to flies and wasps, and if they do not touch him, the stone is genuine; and if he lays aside the stone, at once flies and wasps fall upon the honey and suck it up. And they say that if the stone is held in the mouth it confers [the ability] to judge opinions and thoughts. And it is reported that the wearer is made agreeable and pleasing<\/em> (Albert Magnus, 1967). It is also menioned under similar names (<em>hieracited<\/em>, <em>gerachides<\/em>) in the Pliny&#8217;s and Aristotle&#8217;s work.<\/li>\n<li>More about the allegory of <em>arbor inversa<\/em> during Renaissance, see in Chambers, 1961.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>REFERENCES<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Albert Magnus. (1967). <em>Book of Minerals<\/em>. D. Wyckoff (trans.). Clarendon Press.Baarda, T. (1992). The Etymology of the name of the Evangelist Mark in the Legenda Aurea of Jacobus a Voragine. <em>Nederlands archief voor kerkgeschiedenis<\/em>, <em>72<\/em>(1), 1 \u2013 12.Belobrova, O. A. (1985). Arseniy Satanovskiy (XVII v.). Trudy Otdela drevnerusskoy literatury 40, 45.<\/p>\n<p>Broek, R. Van den. (1972). <em>The Myth of the Phoenix. According to Classical and early Christian Traditions.<\/em> Brill.<\/p>\n<p>Chambers, A. B. (1961). &#8216;I was but an inverted Tree&#8217;: Notes Toward a History of an Idea. <em>Studies in the Renaissance<\/em>, <em>8<\/em>, 291 \u2013 299.<\/p>\n<p>Cruel, R. (1966). <em>Geschichte der deutschen Predigt im Mittelalter<\/em>. Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung.<\/p>\n<p>Gabri\u0107-Bagari\u0107, D. (2012). Fiore di virt\u00f9 i \u017eivotinje. In: S. Marjani\u0107 et, A. Zaradija Ki\u0161 (eds.). <em>Knji\u017eevna \u017eivotinja. Kulturni bestijarij II. dio<\/em> (pp. 351 \u2013 371). Hrvatska sveu\u010dili\u0161na naklada \u2013 Institut za etnologiju i folkloristiku.<\/p>\n<h1>Kaczor, E. (2022). St. Hedwig of Silesia: The Ducal Ideal of a Wife in Light of 15<sup>th<\/sup>-century \u201cSermones de sancta Hedwigis\u201d. <em>Respectus Philologicus<\/em>, <em>41<\/em>(46), 246 \u2013 257.<\/h1>\n<p>Kapetanovi\u0107, A. (2004). Tragovima srednjovjekovnoga bestijarija u Hrvata. <em>Filologija<\/em>, <em>42<\/em>, 47 \u2013 63.<\/p>\n<p>Kapetanovi\u0107, A. (2010). Lucidarij iz Petrisova zbornika. <em>Gra\u0111a za povijest knji\u017eevnosti hrvatske<\/em>, <em>37<\/em>, 3 \u2013 33.<\/p>\n<p>Korzo, M. A. (2024). Simeon Polotsky\u2019s A Garden of Many Flowers as a Mnemonic and Homiletic Manual. In: S. Mengel et, L. Rossi (eds.). <em>Language and Education in Petrine Russia. Essays in Honour of Maria Cristina Bragone<\/em> (pp. 287 \u2013 306). Firenze University Press.<\/p>\n<p>Polockij, S. (1996). <em>Vertograd mnogocvetnyj, Vol. 1: \u201eAaron\u201d \u2013 \u201eDetem blagoslovenie\u201c<\/em>. A. Hippisley et al. (eds.). B\u00f6hlau Verlag.<\/p>\n<p>Preobrazhenskaya, A. (2018). \u201eZveronravnye lyudi\u201c: nravouchitel&#8217;nye exempla v proprovedyakh Simeona Polotskogo. <em>Jezikoslovni zapiski<\/em>,<em> 24<\/em>(2), 161 \u2013 178.<\/p>\n<p>Rado\u0161evi\u0107, A. (2015). Signale der M\u00fcndlichkeit in der kroatischen \u00dcbersetzung der lateinischen Sammlung von Predigten Sermones discipuli des deutschen Dominikaners Johannes Herolt (\u20201468). <em>Germanoslavica: Zeitschrift f\u00fcr germano-slawische Studien<\/em>, <em>26(2)<\/em>, 18 \u2013 40.<\/p>\n<p>Rado\u0161evi\u0107, A. (2022). Animalno i sveto: knjiga o \u017eivotinjama u glagoljskim sermones de sanctis. In: A. Zaradija Ki\u0161 et al. (eds.). <em>Animal.<\/em> <em>Knjga o ljudima i ne-ljudima. Kulturni bestijarij III<\/em> (pp. 109 \u2013 133). Institut za etnologiju i folkloristiku \u2013 Hrvatska sveu\u010dili\u0161na naklada.<\/p>\n<p>Robertson, K. (2012). <em>Exemplary Rocks<\/em>. In: J. J. Cohen (ed.). <em>Animal, Vegetable, Mineral. Ethics and Objects <\/em>(pp. 93 \u2013 123). Oliphaunt Books.<\/p>\n<p>Rydel, C. (2016). Interpretive Etymologies in Translations of the <em>Golden Legend.<\/em> In: P. De Leemans et, M. Goyens (eds.). <em>Translation and Authority \u2013 Authorities in Translation. The Medieval Translator \/ Traduire au Moyen Age<\/em><em>,<\/em> <em>16<\/em> (pp. 289 \u2013 302). Brepols.<\/p>\n<p>Schmidtke, D (2010). \u201eMeffreth\u201c von Mei\u00dfen. Die deutsche Literatur des Mittelalters: Verfasserlexikon. 2. Auflage. Bd. 6 (pp. 297 \u2013 300). Walter de Gruyter.<\/p>\n<p>\u0160tefani\u0107, V. (1960). <em>Glagoljski rukopisi otoka Krka<\/em>. JAZU.<\/p>\n<p>\u0160tefani\u0107, V. (1969). <em>Glagoljski rukopisi Jugoslavenske akademije<\/em>, I dio. JAZU.<\/p>\n<p>Zaradija Ki\u0161, A. (2006.). Pseudoanimalisti\u010dki egzempli u glagoljskome Senjskome korizmenjaku iz 1508. godine. <em>Senjski zbornik<\/em>, <em>33<\/em>(1), 243 \u2013 258.<\/p>\n<p>Zaradija Ki\u0161, A. (2008). Egzempli kao srednjovjekovni bestijarij: animalisti\u010dki egzempl u hrvatskoglagoljskom knji\u017eevnom korpusu. In: M. Samard\u017eija (ed.). <em>Vidjeti Ohrid<\/em> (pp. 117 \u2013 140). Hrvatsko filolo\u0161ko dru\u0161tvo \u2013 Hrvatska sveu\u010dili\u0161na naklada.<\/p>\n<p>Zaradija Ki\u0161, A. (2010). Motiv rajske ptice u auditivnoj percepiji raja u glagoljskim egzemplima. <em>Kroatologija<\/em>, <em>1<\/em>, 339 \u2013 362.<\/p>\n<p>Zaradija Ki\u0161, A. (2018). Bliski i daleki drugi: animalisti\u010dke sastavnice Cvijeta kreposti. <em>Fluminensia<\/em>, <em>30<\/em>(1), 189 \u2013 220.<\/p>\n<p>Zaradija Ki\u0161, A. &amp; \u0160imi\u0107, M. (2020). <em>Cvijet kreposti ili o naravi ljudskoj kroz narav \u017eivotinjsku. Studija \u2013 transliteracija \u2013 faksimil<\/em>. Hrvatska sveu\u010dili\u0161na naklada \u2013 Institut za etnologiju i folkloristiku \u2013 Staroslavenski institut.<\/p>\n<p>Weisl, A. J. (2018). Briddes Wise: Chaucer\u2019s Avian Poetics. In: A. Langdon (ed.). <em>Animal Languages in the Middle Ages. Animal Languages in the Middle Ages Representations of Interspecies Communication<\/em> (pp. 113 \u2013 132). Palgrave Macmillan.<\/p>\n<p>Wenzel, S. (2013).<em> The Art of Preaching: Five Medieval Texts and Translations<\/em>. Catholic University of America Press.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Sources<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Disipul A<\/em>, mid. 16<sup>th<\/sup> century, Archive of Diocese of Krk<\/p>\n<p><em>Disipul B<\/em>, 1558, Archive of Croatian Academy of Arts and Sciences, call number <em>VIII 126<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Disipul C<\/em>, 1541, Archive of Croatian Academy of Arts and Sciences, call number <em>IV a 95<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Disipul D<\/em>, 1600, Archive of Croatian Academy of Arts and Sciences, call number <em>III b 13<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Hortulus reginae, 1487, <em>Sermones \u2018Meffreth\u2019 de tempore et de sanctis sive Hortulus Reginae<\/em>. N\u00fcrnberg.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><strong>Prof. Dr. Andrea Rado\u0161evi\u0107<\/strong>ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8695-0573<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\">Old Church Slavonic InsituteDemetrova 11 Zagreb (Croatia)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\">E-mail: <a href=\"mailto:aradosevic@stin.hr\">aradosevic@stin.hr<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/bel_01s_2026_andrea-adosevic.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">>> Download the article as a PDF file <<<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Prof. Dr. Andrea Rado\u0161evi\u0107, Old Church Slavonic Insitute \u2013 Zagreb (Croatia)\u00a0 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.53656\/bel-2026-1s-6 Abstract. One of the most important sources for researching the Book of Nature in the Croatian Glagolitic medieval literature are sermon collections. The chapters based on the Book of Nature are found in the de sanctis cycle of the four Glagolitic manuscripts from [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":124332423427287,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":[],"jnews_primary_category":[]},"categories":[1],"tags":[17705,17703,13513,17704],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Book of nature in Croatian Glagolitic sermones de sanctis - \u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Book of nature in Croatian Glagolitic sermones de sanctis - \u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Prof. Dr. Andrea Rado\u0161evi\u0107, Old Church Slavonic Insitute \u2013 Zagreb (Croatia)\u00a0 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.53656\/bel-2026-1s-6 Abstract. One of the most important sources for researching the Book of Nature in the Croatian Glagolitic medieval literature are sermon collections. The chapters based on the Book of Nature are found in the de sanctis cycle of the four Glagolitic manuscripts from [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"\u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Azbuki55\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-08T12:08:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"\u201e\u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438\u201c\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"\u201e\u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438\u201c\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"21 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\u201e\u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438\u201c\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#\/schema\/person\/de220d282eaa494f914ce0fd838645dd\"},\"headline\":\"Book of nature in Croatian Glagolitic sermones de sanctis\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-08T12:08:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-08T12:08:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/\"},\"wordCount\":4967,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Book of Nature\",\"Croatian Glagolitic sermons\",\"hagiography\",\"Meffreth\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/\",\"name\":\"Book of nature in Croatian Glagolitic sermones de sanctis - \u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-08T12:08:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-08T12:08:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/history.azbuki.bg\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Book of nature in Croatian Glagolitic sermones de sanctis\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/\",\"name\":\"\u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438\",\"description\":\"\u041d\u0430\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u0430\u043b\u043d\u043e \u0438\u0437\u0434\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e \u0437\u0430 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0438 \u043d\u0430\u0443\u043a\u0430\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#organization\",\"name\":\"\u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/logo-azbuki-e1580374651845.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/logo-azbuki-e1580374651845.png\",\"width\":250,\"height\":70,\"caption\":\"\u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Azbuki55\/\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/nion_azbuki\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#\/schema\/person\/de220d282eaa494f914ce0fd838645dd\",\"name\":\"\u201e\u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438\u201c\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d08ccbd951212deb604aa2d403575d4e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d08ccbd951212deb604aa2d403575d4e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"\u201e\u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438\u201c\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/press.azbuki.bg\/en\/author\/azbuki_ekip\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Book of nature in Croatian Glagolitic sermones de sanctis - \u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Book of nature in Croatian Glagolitic sermones de sanctis - \u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438","og_description":"Prof. Dr. Andrea Rado\u0161evi\u0107, Old Church Slavonic Insitute \u2013 Zagreb (Croatia)\u00a0 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.53656\/bel-2026-1s-6 Abstract. One of the most important sources for researching the Book of Nature in the Croatian Glagolitic medieval literature are sermon collections. The chapters based on the Book of Nature are found in the de sanctis cycle of the four Glagolitic manuscripts from [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/","og_site_name":"\u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Azbuki55\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-08T12:08:50+00:00","author":"\u201e\u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438\u201c","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"\u201e\u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438\u201c","Est. reading time":"21 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/"},"author":{"name":"\u201e\u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438\u201c","@id":"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#\/schema\/person\/de220d282eaa494f914ce0fd838645dd"},"headline":"Book of nature in Croatian Glagolitic sermones de sanctis","datePublished":"2026-04-08T12:08:50+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-08T12:08:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/"},"wordCount":4967,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#organization"},"keywords":["Book of Nature","Croatian Glagolitic sermons","hagiography","Meffreth"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/","url":"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/","name":"Book of nature in Croatian Glagolitic sermones de sanctis - \u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-08T12:08:50+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-08T12:08:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/uncategorized\/book-of-nature-in-croatian-glagolitic-sermones-de-sanctis\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/history.azbuki.bg\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Book of nature in Croatian Glagolitic sermones de sanctis"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#website","url":"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/","name":"\u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438","description":"\u041d\u0430\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u0430\u043b\u043d\u043e \u0438\u0437\u0434\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e \u0437\u0430 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0438 \u043d\u0430\u0443\u043a\u0430","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#organization","name":"\u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438","url":"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/logo-azbuki-e1580374651845.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/logo-azbuki-e1580374651845.png","width":250,"height":70,"caption":"\u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Azbuki55\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/nion_azbuki\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#\/schema\/person\/de220d282eaa494f914ce0fd838645dd","name":"\u201e\u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438\u201c","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/vocedu.azbuki.bg\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d08ccbd951212deb604aa2d403575d4e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d08ccbd951212deb604aa2d403575d4e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"\u201e\u0410\u0437-\u0431\u0443\u043a\u0438\u201c"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/azbuki.bg\/"],"url":"https:\/\/press.azbuki.bg\/en\/author\/azbuki_ekip\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/press.azbuki.bg\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227075"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/press.azbuki.bg\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/press.azbuki.bg\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/press.azbuki.bg\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/124332423427287"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/press.azbuki.bg\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=227075"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/press.azbuki.bg\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227075\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":227127,"href":"https:\/\/press.azbuki.bg\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227075\/revisions\/227127"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/press.azbuki.bg\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=227075"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/press.azbuki.bg\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=227075"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/press.azbuki.bg\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=227075"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}